Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with editing
Search options not deleted
user 9517
2
votes
Users with editing privileges can no longer approve edits
What has recently changed is
2012-10-16: The number of reviews required to accept/reject suggested edits has been increased to two Network wide (versus 1 before) and three on Stack Overflow. (versus …
CommunityBot
- 1
2
votes
What is (or what should be) the etiquette for editing old questions or posts?
I don't see what the conflicting advice is here. It was me that suggested you do 4 or 5 at a time so that you don't flood the front page with edits (as I knew you'd go at it with a certain gusto)
…
- 117k
3
votes
What do we do when a user edits their own post while not logged in or logged in as a differe...
The latter I would reject - the question is old, has (accepted) answers and there is no evidence that the edit is by the OP. I'm not sure if the anonymous user would get an custom reject message but I …
- 117k
7
votes
editing other user's posts for completely trivial reasons
Someone editing your posts to conform with more normal English usage should be expected (it's encouraged, we have badges for editing). There are even tools to help do this. …
CommunityBot
- 1