Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with low-quality
Search options not deleted
user 9517
12
votes
Stack Overflow Inc. changes policy regarding enforcement of AI-Generated posts
Oh dear, the Amazon sized river of shit that is the question feed will now be complimented by a gulf stream of crappy LLM answers. With so few people who actually curate the content here it's no going …
- 117k
3
votes
"bumped to the homepage by Community" generate mostly noise
Remember that voting in all of it's forms is community oversight. It's not about giving away a PhD, you don't need to solve the halting problem information just needs to be clear and correct/helpful.
…
- 117k
13
votes
Why is there so much focus on low-quality questions at-large?
where we came in?
There is always a focus on quality not just at election time, SE is supposed to be a repository of high quality Q&A.
Perhaps I am missing some relevant history.
Yes, lots, mos …
- 117k
5
votes
How high should the bar be for the OP answering his own question?
I disagree. The bar should be exactly as high as it is for everyone else. We're meant to be curating a corpus of high quality Q&A. If you let one class of user get away with low quality Q&A then you h …
- 117k