Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with syntax-highlighting
Search options not deleted
user 984
3
votes
1
answer
46
views
Broken highlighting. ruby-on-rails
This question Problems installing Gitorious on Debian 6.0.4 has broken highlighting. It appears to because of the ruby-on-rails tag.
I semi-randomly looked at a couple dozen questions in that tag, a …
- 133k
1
vote
Is the syntax highlighting for Code blocks useful on SF?
It appears this can now be addresses by manually specifying the language.
- 133k
4
votes
6
answers
194
views
Is the syntax highlighting for Code blocks useful on SF?
I know the syntax highlighting for code blocks is disabled on superuser. Do we want it disabled here as well?
It seems to me that the large majority of the time a code block is used is for log fragm …
- 133k