Oh, please do not reset it to 5 while reviewing anything. This change has been such a massive improvement that going back to 5 even briefly would just bring back all the old pain.
Questions are actually starting to get closed and reopened again in more reasonable timeframes, though with all the high reputation people who have left that may not be saying a ...
Are there things other than 3-vote close impacting your interest in reviewing?
The UI changes that increase the number of clicks required to do common tasks certainly hasn't increased my motivation levels to wade through the review queues.
Some of you may have noticed the Meta Stack Exchange post - Testing three-vote close and reopen on 13 network sites (it's linked in the featured on meta sidebar) - we've finally got this project under way and Server Fault is one of the sites we'll be running the test on.
Starting tomorrow, I'll be changing the site setting and closing and reopening will ...
From this moderator's point of view the change has been beneficial. Flag-volume is mostly not an answer issues, and is leaving the questions alone for the most part. Once in a while I'll see one requesting a migration to someplace not on our list. The number of low quality on questions has gone down.
Given our volumes the 3 vote limit is much more likely to ...
I Agree to Everyone, 3 is a nice number which does do its job. It's DEFINITELY helping, yes.
Did this help? -YES, Definitely
Did it Hurt? -Only those, that are Spamming this Site with Off topic - So IMHO No ;-)
Did it make you more interested in close/reopen reviewing? Less? -I agree that, it will be more interested than it would be on Five. To be ...
My impressions as a new user here:
Many questions are RTFM-questions. People claim to have read the manual, yet the manual clearly answers their questions.
Lack of research or understanding. People may be good programmers, but that doesn't help them solve networking problems.
Most questions are by new users with minimal history.
This leads to a few ...