@syneticon-dj So there's less competition and more of the big bucks for them, obviously.

@Zoredache While it's not exactly a high quality answer, that's not necessarily the same as an answer deserving a delete vote, a downvote and/or a flag. Like Chris points out in his answer, the review audit system is supposed to providing tests with example that are clear-cut right or wrong, and it's not, due to the current implementation used to select audit material. Yippie, devops.

@canpoyrazoğlu You really don't need to convince me; I could only tolerate one quarter of living in dorms when I was in school. But even if we accept that you're completely right, you're still trying to circumvent policy (which is misuse of the network), still in a home setting, and still not functioning in a professional capacity, so the question's off topic.

@canpoyrazoğlu Because you're asking for help circumventing security or policy (your university's NAT scheme), and your UDP hole idea could be seen as hacking and/or system misuse. If one of my users tried something like that on my network, they'd have my boot so far up their ass they'd be able to feel it in the back of their throat.

@Iain Are our reviewers really of SO-level quality? I know it banned a lot of SO reviewers who were blatantly badge-whoring, but I'm not sure the community here will be impacted to the same degree.

@syneticon-dj Well, on SO, yeah.

I'd be interested in running for treasurer... but I don't see a need for new moderators, given the lack of opportunity for embezzlement in that position.

@ChrisS I'm in the "bad answers have an important place in instructing people what NOT to do" camp, and I think it should be left around...

@voretaq7 *AMP stacks do also/can also have their place in production (I've used them as part of imaging suites, like F.O.G. and Clonezilla), so I feel it's a bad idea to specifically call out AMP stacks as off-topic development tools when it's the usage that's causing the problem rather than the AMP stack itself.