@HopelessN00b Actually, I expected an answer like: "(1) is because... (2) is not so, (3) is okay, because...". And then I had got away with peace.

@HopelessN00b And what I don't understand: I didn't even said that all of these changes were bad! I even supported (1), and wish to remain!

@HopelessN00b It were very clear reason for 1 downs, but not for 5. Actually what I really miss here, is the clear answer, the downvotes I simply don't understand. Really only I experienced the named changes here?

Hm. There is no answer, but soon 3 downvotes, and critics against the "sentiment of my question". Heyy! This time I tried to be really nice! What had been happened if I don't? :-)

@HopelessN00b About your "personal diosagreement": you think it is not so as I write, or you think, I see these changes well, but they are on your opinion okay?

@HopelessN00b Personal disagreement can be maybe explained more clearly in an answer as with downvotes. I also write: "I don't have evidence if there is also causal link."

@Sven Well, now I am only curious why you do this. Actually, the downvotes are answers, too, but I think, you could be nicer...

@Sven Maybe disagreement with the statements in my question?

@Sven I know, but disagreement with what? Disagreement with a question?

This time I only asked a question, I hadn't any negativ intent. Imho, the moderation of the SF is currently the best between the for me known SF sites, and this was also a reason to be as nice, as possible. I really can't understand the downvote.

In the sense of the hostility, SO is much worser as SF.