Skip to main content
peterh's user avatar
peterh's user avatar
peterh's user avatar
peterh
  • Member for 11 years
  • Last seen more than a month ago
comment
How to deal with people that don't accept your reasoning?
@Gaia Do you understand my question?
comment
How to deal with people that don't accept your reasoning?
@JennyD Would you check the edit log again?
comment
How to deal with people that don't accept your reasoning?
@Gaia Honestly, I never wanted to make a such scandal from that. I've seen a logo, I quickly removed it, that was all. I also never wanted conflict with you. I ask again: do you really want this question to be well-indexed by the google, or not? (If I change my vote, it will be!)
comment
How to deal with people that don't accept your reasoning?
@Gaia See my reasoning in my answer. The question remains: do you really want this question to be well-indexed by the google, or not?
Loading…
accepted
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
Well, this answer is very far which I could agree, but at least it is clear. Anyways, it is soon very good if you are at least capable to explain clearly what are you doing and why. Thank you.
answered
Loading…
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@JennyD Yes, and you will get the data - next time.
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@JennyD Actually, the best argument will be behind my statements in the eyes of the future visitors: in a healthy environment, a such question as mine never gets this reaction as it got.
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@JennyD No, there was a change in the behavior of the mods, you also know this, I also know this. But you won't admit this, but are handling this question as a false accuse. But there wasn't accusation, there was only a question. And, of course, there isn't any data, how the hell could I have to think I get a such hostile reaction back? If I knew that, I had started this whole thread absolutely other ways! It is so simple.
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@JennyD There was factual basis. You could have simply explain, why are you doing this. I probably didn't agree with all of the changes, but there hadn't been a conflict. And now, back to work, bye. Next time I will be harder (f.e. I will have "facts", and I will accuse based on them - it seems this is the only way in which we can communicate).
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@JennyD You are right, thank you. I stop the communication in this thread, because you are handling this as a conflict, in which I won't take part.
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@JennyD Well, actually I could continue, but this is probably not what you want, and also not what I want. Now I won't conflict with you, I didn't gave a reason for you to this behavior (my original post wasn't attacking), so I won't communicate in this thread with the exception to mention, that I stepped out.
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@Reaces Read again: "I stop this thread". Understood? Thanks.
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
I don't want conflict, I only asked things, with peace, this is because I stop this thread.
awarded
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
Ok. So, you say the changes I mentioned simply didn't happen?
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@JennyD Ok. Yes, I did it, because their name I've seen most times behind the changes. Stats I don't have, first because I didn't collect, second because I don't see it would be needed, at least not now.
comment
Recent changes of site moderation behavior
@JennyD Yes, there is no evidence, because now in this post I didn't accuse anybody. I only asked, why are these. I think it was enough clear.