Skip to main content
EEAA's user avatar
EEAA's user avatar
EEAA's user avatar
EEAA
  • Member for 15 years, 2 months
  • Last seen more than 3 years ago
  • Minneapolis, MN
comment
Is ServerFault doomed? Not if we all vote more!
@SorinSbarnea - No one said this was a crime. There are firewall restrictions in place that prohibit the traffic. By definition, it's against policy. Again, request a firewall rule exemption if you have a business case for this. Then you don't need to worry about getting around the firewall rules.
comment
Is ServerFault doomed? Not if we all vote more!
@SorinSbarnea - with regards to your question which got closed. You have to understand - the target users of SF are the very people who are responsible for implementing and maintaining the exact restrictions you were trying to circumvent. Even if you have a business need for that, it's still inappropriate to circumvent policy, and you won't be getting any help from us in doing so.
comment
Closing old questions which have answers?
Closed questions certainly do appear in search results. Coincidentally, I landed on a closed SO question just yesterday evening.
comment
Can we do anything to change the dynamic of the site?
Cripes - look at the last 8 hours of questions. Horrible.
accepted
revised
Loading…
asked
Loading…
comment
comment
serverfault main formatting has a problem in Chrome Browser
Hold down shift, and click the refresh icon, to the left of the address bar.
comment
serverfault main formatting has a problem in Chrome Browser
Shift-Refresh? It has looked fine for me all day.
Loading…
comment
Why the hostility?
I agree, the hostility was unnecessary. I tried, in my comment, to present a reasonable explanation, without casting blame or negativity. Perhaps I could have done better, though.
awarded
comment
Can you help me formulate a better question (re: server security)
The issue wasn't that your question was all too vague. Rather, it was overly broad. As mentioned below, dealing properly with this broad of a question requires books, not a few hundred words in a SF answer.
comment
Who declines flags?
I recently had two spam flags declined (flag 1, flag 2), when both of those were very obviously spam posts. I had edited out the spam links before flagging them, which perhaps was the problem. I guess I just wish a bit more care would be taken when declining flags. It would have taken 5 seconds more to look at the the edit history to see that the OP did indeed post spam links.
awarded
comment
Proposed new language for FAQ
@martin's - it's quite frustrating that you keep ignoring the facts here and ignoring (or selectively forgetting) what myself (and others) have said. If you continue that, the likelihood of any of us taking you seriously is zero. I'll try one more time to explain: XAMPP is a development tool. Yes, it can be used in a pro environment. As a dev tool. Any other usage of it goes against the XAMPP charter, is ill-advised, and non-professional and as such, is off-topic.
comment
Proposed new language for FAQ
@martin's - VMware questions are most definitely not off-topic. The sole reason the vmware tag was banned is that VMware is a company, not a product. People were using the vmware tag where they should have been using a "vmware-esxi" or "vmware-vcenter" tag. Tag banning is not an indicator of topicality. Tag bans are put in place due to repeated improper use of a tag.
comment
Proposed new language for FAQ
@martin's - you were not called a troll for challenging SF. You were called a troll for 1) your tone (accusatory, condescending, non-constructive) and 2) the fact that (after many people tried to communicate this to you) you would not acknowledge the fact that XAMPP was a dev tool. Look at this from an objective perspective: a brand new user shows up, asks an off-topic question, takes offense, and proceeds to start making demands of the community without truly taking time to understand the community first, all the while, ignoring and insulting those who were trying to clarify things for you.
comment
Proposed new language for FAQ
@martin's - Well as stated before, the SO->SF migration path is no more, so that shouldn't be an issue. If XAMPP questions are being closed on SO, then you need to raise that over on mSO.
1
15 16
17
18 19
25