Late to a party but there is additional important consideration. Questions about circumventing authority-induced censorship (Russia, Iran, China) happen from time to time. While technically avoiding the censorship might be the against the law in those countries, it is actually because the law is violating the human rights and it is good thing to help people to have a free speech. The only unfortunate problem is that usually those questions are full of other problems (bad statement, clearly insufficient competence and so on). But those should not be closed because of policy violation per se.

Well, I missed that it was edited by the author.

Yes, I noticed you were always on the "don't belong" side. What about questions like "is this setup adequate"? It's normal for them to cite inadequate setup, this is the purpose of the question to verify it. The question in the question is like that. Is it normal to close them as citing inadequate solution rather than answering with that and explaining why?