Tags should be nouns, not adjectives or adverbs.

+1 I think that's the crux of my objection to Vortaq's answer: yes directly answer their question is probably off topic or at least of minimal value to the community, but how you answered the question is of fairly significant value.

@voretaq7 Kyle has habit of talking about what he wants to say instead of saying it. He has apparently never heard of panning for gold either. He's free to correct me if I'm wrong but I think he's saying that we should not have a rule regarding specification-type questions. We should apply the rules we have already, per the new FAQ (which needs some final polishing before posting), and as according to our previous criteria for prerequisite knowledge.

"You have to pan a lot of silt to get a little gold"

@WesleyDavid tinyurl.com/6rgxujz

@WesleyDavid "and it is not about… Anything in a home setting. No exceptions." Good enough?

If a question is crap, it should be closed, immediately. If the user wants to edit it, it can easily be reopened. If the user would simply prefer to start over they can submit a new question. It's not like we're banning the user for a single bad question.

+1 You don't come to Google and talk to a man like Moe Greene like that! Google comes to you.

I can see my most recent f-up. They should be showing for you as well.

I don't mind that FW is gone. But 1. The effort to undo a "bad" flag was massively over weighted. 2. People usually got the most frustrated when mods had a relatively minor difference of opinion, declined the flag as unhelpful, didn't leave feedback (including when there wasn't a mechanism) and refused to respond when the users tried to have a public discussion about the matter. I feel that the mods who participate most in the site got the lion's share of the complains; while the "less active" mods were more likely to "blame". In any case, scorched earth does "fix" the symptom...

@MarkHenderson Totally agree, I'm only voting yes to get that option, do not want automatic anything. =]