The first search is pretty long, and adding a year or feature code to a tag like that is going to make it massive, over the character limit. The Second, which is probably the widest recognized by SAs, is the same as Womble's suggestion. Sounds like the way to go.

I don't think 4 downvotes will trip the detector, though its around that level. In any case a quick upvote from one of us will more than compensate for your rep losses. ;)

IIRC IE, FF, and Chrome are the only three they test with internally before rolling an update (assuming they test the update; which usually happens). There's some semi-official feedback mechanism on mSO, but I can't remember where and I'm not going over there unless I have to.

In addition to what Chopper said, it doesn't take all that many votes (up or down) to trip the automated bots.

@Jeff Jeebus, you wrote a book on it.

re: a) There'll eventually be other versions of TMG, so TMG-2010 shouldn't be a synonym for TMG. There's only 3 tags, one for general TMG, one for TMG 2010, and one for Forefront (ie Antigen) products. b) Microsoft's website is littered with various acronyms. I agree that FTMG sounds weird, I didn't make it up. Your last sentence doesn't make sense. Could you restate it, or perhaps clearly & explicitly outline how you think the tags should be laid out?

@U4, yes, you can Answer other people's question, once you've got a handful of upvotes from that you should be able to Ask again (it may take a whole day for the system to pickup the change). Note: your last 12 Answer have netted you -1 votes total; that factors into being able to Ask.

Is is possible to lock every bit of it, fixate it in history and prevent it from ever popping up on the front page again?