No difference. You have to fail several audits in a short time to have any effect. I'd have to look-up the exact numbers (and verify if I'm allowed to disclose them publicly), but I don't think anyone has ever tripped the Audit Failure system on Server Fault yet, which just bans you from the review queues for a day or so.

Having a rough morning? I haven't seen you this snarky in months.

@MadHatter I want to agree, but see A LOT of edit suggestions where people blindly approve them. Even requiring 2 people's approval I still have to reverse edits from time to time.

Reputation doesn't go less than 1. And downvotes that would have taken you lower than 1 are ignored. Without looking your 13 could be the result of -100000 followed by +12.

Better, probably have to be good enough. Maybe reword slightly to "are off-topic because the answers they attract are low quality, opinionated, spam, or become obsolete quickly", just to shorten it up a bit.

I like the text better, but now it doesn't match the linked article at all... though I think the problem is more with needing a better article to link.

-1 I was going to upvote for the well written question and vaguely interesting discussion. But then "If the question gets a bunch of downvotes...I'll give up the 'cause'".

It was supposed to be a network-wide ban on shopping questions, but sites that came after that ban have picked what parts of it they want to enforce...

Also, the Auto-CW thing has been disabled. Once a Post hits that tripwire it's flagged for Mod review, but nothing else.

The Community Wiki is back, but I'm not sure about being "in vogue". CWs are mostly ancient crap, most of which shouldn't be Wikis. The Canonical Q&As are our best source of good information.