@MichaelHampton: Ah. Lame. I just pulled it over because it got lots of votes last year.

@MetaChrome: It is rather magnanimous of you to allow for the fact that a situation that exists in nearly every single IT organization larger than 10 employees.

@Wesley: You want me to go find something that doesn't have me wearing a hat?

@samsmith: The knee-jerk "blame the victim" claim is a hallmark of the overly PC 1990s USA. Stating that poverty exists is not the same as calling the poor lazy bastards for not pulling their weight. Similarly, Iain's statement that the site has questions that are misrepresenting the purpose of SF is not the same as calling you an ignorant chump for daring to disagree.

@MadHatter: Bro. Do you even diagram sentences?

It feels like about a third of the audits are bad. Given that they must assume that still open questions are good examples we're more likely simply missing things that are closable.

@AaronCopley: You're totally using your soft phone.

@DennisKaarsemaker: You mean something like, "Questions about cPanel are off-topic because you're embarrassing yourself and the rest of us." ?

They got both kinds: buggy and crap.

Which is terrible because I would have closed that shit anyway. I just mark that up to the review audits having a surprisingly high failure rate.