I find this to be fairly vague and exclusionary, even more so than August's.

On main you would have gotten +50 by now from sheer respect for breaking the tl;dr; records.

@ChrisS: Which is exactly why I'm not correcting you. :)

@ChrisS: I suspect the Information Security community tends to believe the overlap does exist, but is fairly small.

RAIM: Redundant Array of Inexpensive Mobiles

@Rhyuk: I certainly thought so. As I recall that one hit reddit and drove a mindblowingly amount of traffic to the site. Like ChrisS said, it's open not because we want it, but because it was deemed to be an acceptable evil.

@Rhyuk: I can tell that you're feeling upset and defensive. I recognize the validity of those feelings. While we are all human, and as such do occasionally make mistakes. However, I feel the majority of voters do their best to honestly vote according to the FAQ.

@Rhyuk: The questions and answers on the site effectively serve three purposes: 1) Be useful, 2) Represent the site and it's culture and community, 3) Follow the strictures set down on high from SEI. The FAQ does its level best to lay those out, but sometimes nuances slip through the cracks. Just because you the asker finds the answers acceptable, doesn't mean the question itself fits within the broader scope of those purposes. Shopping questions are a great example of what's verboten, but may trivially be answered according to the asker.

Get your own idiom!

I hate all ya'll.

Are you @vortaq's sockpuppet?

How do you feel about an answer that answers a different question (e.g. "Q: What is 1+1? A: Blue")?