@Chopper Noted. Pokin' folks about this now.

@syneticon That location change is a rather major problem. It may still be there, and now more changeable than before (we used to have a restriction on trilogy sites but with the new Help Center, the SF mods should be able to edit it at any time), but it's currently inconvenient to access and the move has invalidated a lot of history of guidance.

@MDMarra Even if we'd like a more general term, I don't see the harm in also having a technical one as well. /readme sounds pretty appropriate.

So I know that a nice solution to one small portion of this is that /faq should point not at the hub of the whole thing, but specifically at the on-topic stuff. I will push for this but I'd like some alternatives. /rules? /scope? If the word FAQ wasn't an option, what do you feel would be the best "name" for the primary destination of education?

@Iain I mean, I checked internally with people who informed me that we did focus group testing with existing users as well as new users.

@Iain I checked internally, we did some evaluation on that end and the response was largely positive. Probably might've helped to focus more on ironing out issues than fixing up various privilege/badge quirks. We'll work on that as well as better spread of communication, especially with regards to advance news of upcoming changes.

@MadHatter Moderators can create chatrooms for their sites that have private level access. This is pretty much the only moderator-only tool we provide that can be used in this direction, if one goes in that direction.

That works for me. Thanks for the clarification!

This already exists, we already log activity and periodically check in on moderator duties done on each site on the network. So this question feels moot, unless you have a different motive behind it that I'm not seeing.