comment
I'm tired of answering questions with: "Upgrade the firmware" or "Run updates"
@Massimo I can assure you - not only Italians do think that way. "Do not touch a running system" is different than "Do not run a touchy system". The latter was the case here and could have been fixed by patching.
comment
Serverfault and Unix/Linux
On UL you can keep track. SF has just too many questions per day, so I would rather vote for creating a Windows-Server branch to diversify SF further.
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
How should I reword this virtualization question?
@voretaq7 I had an uneasy feeling about this question right when I asked it - it is in a very grey area - I knew that, but the question and answers should help professional sysadmins - and that is right on focus, is it not?
comment
How should I reword this virtualization question?
There were two reasons to ask this question. First - I came across that our Windows-Hyper-V-guys developed quite the same limits as we did with Linux/XEN. Second there was a question on how to reduce interrupts in a VM where the network-interrupts maxed out on a specific interface. IMHO this would max out on any VM-technique (if you stay with the same hardware).
comment
How should I reword this virtualization question?
Thanks for the edit and re-open. The answers up until now go into the right direction.
Loading…
comment
Why do sysadmins reinvent the wheel all the time?
Good example. So basically you think sysadmins and software programmers are in a comparable position. This is a great relief - although it seems to make it a common IT-problem.
Loading…
comment
Should "on topic" be narrowed down on SF?
The statistics seem to say that my assumption is wrong here. So let`s get back to "off topic" - since tightening the "on topic" is out of question for at least three moderators here - I take your answer as "You may flag questions with non-professional background, that fit into other sites as off-topic and name the site it should be moved to. The moderators will be happy to do so (even for closed questions)." right?
comment
Should "on topic" be narrowed down on SF?
@DJPon3 Citation? This is selv-experience. Perhaps my questions are too complex (one of this was not even my question)? This seems to be a common behaviour on every site - first scan the bounty-questions - then go for the rest. So a bounty question gets more attention (which is intended) but on SF I have the feeling that there is not enough attention for non-bounty-questions.
comment
Should "on topic" be narrowed down on SF?
@Zoredache the blog article targets question-writers. Not people like me who mainly answer questions. I really like to answer more of them - lack of knowledge is not my problem here. It is lack of time to find these questions.
comment
Should "on topic" be narrowed down on SF?
Currently I will not mark these off topic, since they are on topic (e.g. on SF AND UL).
comment
Should "on topic" be narrowed down on SF?
Understand me right - SF is great. But currently the only way to get a proper answer is to set a bounty to a question. I do not think that this is normal.
comment
Should "on topic" be narrowed down on SF?
Is there a statistic across all sites for the current time to answer? My guess is that this time is pretty bad on SF, because many people just don`t see the question (in time).