Okay, thanks for the response.

On a purely personal level after having spent a while reading through a lot of questions, I think there is a lot of inconsistency in the way the FAQ is applied by voters. I appreciate there's not much that can be done, because people are people, but it irks me (I like consistency, and I like things to make sense). Lots of posts with 'interesting' questions that don't look like professional queries seem to survive, but boring border-line ones get voted off.

Could people voting this question down post comments on why?

The original question was answered pretty quickly as well. I don't say this just to be argumentative, but to try and understand. Anyway, thanks for the responses.

I didn't vote, because I'm more confused about what is and isn't applicable than I have been in the past.

I disagree with you but if you're right, why isn't the second post also a candidate? Where's the consistency? I appreciate that consistency is hard to achieve, but I don't understand why one post is moved and not the other, additionally, as one commenter said, why does a post about VPN access to work not get moved when a post asking how to SSH into work does?