@vortaq7, I don't recall ever saying unkind things about the server. Unlike people, I treat servers with due respect.

@Jarrod, a screen shot is only going to show the same error message, so I really don't see how that will help. The error occurred when I clicked on the question from the front page. Clicking on other questions worked perfectly. The only other relevant information I can supply the next time this happens is the exact date and time.

Care to post a Readers Digest version of that? I noticed you have a habit of writing excessively and unnecessarily long posts.

When I looked at that question the oldest version was not what you say it was, which is why I said what I said. However, as I also did not have the roll-back option it is possible that the page I saw was incomplete. However, I can only go on what I personally see.

Thanks Ward, I had a look through the earlier revisions and there was no roll-back option anywhere at that time. Something weird's going on.

Editing an answer, any answer, to alter the intent and meaning of that answer is even more wrong than what is being discussed here and should never be done.

There's nothing wrong with wishing. I personally still live in a fantasy land where there is hope that the Stack Exchange devs will eventually learn about UI design and start thinking like users, with the result that all those UI issues we have get fixed.

I suspect that seeing another answer well outscored the accepted answer is enough to let people recognise the situation. Then again, I'm frequently wrong about humans.

The less you concern yourself with the details the faster you will qualify. Think of it like a kettle coming to the bail - it's faster when you don't watch.

@HopelessN00b, despite our occasional disagreements I can see we have a fait bit in common. :)

Until someone gets the idea of bringing it back to show us some more unnecessary crap.

Those of you who think you're perfect just make things awkward for those of us who are. Other than that, +1.

@Brent, I tend to just wait till the bounty expires and then cast my vote.

Dunno but maybe we should track its usage :) BTW, is that your big word for the day? It's much bigger than "superfluous".

It really sucks that crap "questions" can't be closed while they have a bounty. I've seen more than one have a bounty applied for the sole purpose of preventing closure.