There's probably an app for that.

@jez, just because a question is popular does not mean it's on topic. there was a lot of crap posted in the past that will not be accepted now. There have been a number of discussions relating to why these questions should not be allowed. Before arguing the case please take some time to go through previous meta posts, which will give you a much better idea of why we do what we do.

The OP posting a bounty on that question has merely postponed the inevitable.

The problem remains that "WiFi" has no definition.

@smcg, why? I'm able to search for such things just fine.

Welcome to meta and you are most welcome to participate (especially when you agree with something I said). :)

My point is simply that the question either is or is not on topic. Throwing a few keywords at it won't change things.

It's not the words used that makes a question on topic. It's the context.

What's with all the "(!)"? If you're going to write like kid you can expect to be treated accordingly.

"status-completed" - Three cheers and thanks for making our little corner of the digital world a happier place to be.

Potentially yes, although I've yet to see a Bluetooth question that is on topic. Regardless, if we're trying to make a single tag to cover what we normally consider to be "wireless" then it should ideally be as exclusionist as possible.

wireless-network is still a little vague for my tastes. e.g. Bluetooth is wireless networking, even though it normally consists of only two devices on that network.