Timeline for Why was my server 2003 question moved to superuser.com?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 at 16:23 | comment | added | dunxd | So are you saying you would vote to move any question that had 4 move votes already? | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 15:31 | comment | added | Chopper3 Mod | @Jeff, it wasn't long originally, it was two sentence before his edit, the reason it was migrated was because 4 people before me thought it was better moved. I can't speak for those four people but the reason it was migrated was simply "because 5 different users voted". Do we really need to change the 'move' form to include justifications for people who write a bad question then put oceans more time into boohoo'ing about it on meta than they did into the original question or even the original whine? If so that's not mod'ing it's babysitting and I don't have time to wipe oversensitive chins. | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 14:27 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @chopper3 I think when someone writes up a long meta post in good faith they probably should be extended the courtesy of a more detailed response... | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 12:51 | comment | added | user9517 | @seanyboy - I voted to send it to SU because I thought your most likely to get a better and quicker answer over there. | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 11:52 | comment | added | Chopper3 Mod | Because you gave us very little information at all to work off and your problem is almost certainly generic, that it's on a server of some sort is unlikely to be part of the issue. | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 11:49 | comment | added | seanyboy | That's not at all helpful. | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 11:15 | comment | added | Chopper3 Mod | Because 5 different users voted to move it there. | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 11:11 | comment | added | seanyboy | OK - So why did you vote to move it to superuser? | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 11:03 | history | answered | Chopper3Mod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |