Timeline for Can the Vmware tag be deleted ?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 8, 2011 at 10:48 | comment | added | JamesRyan | But then you have to look through all the questions that ARE product specific because you have lost the ability to differentiate when tagging. | |
Apr 8, 2011 at 10:29 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @james use tag wildcards like vmware* that is what they are designed for. | |
Apr 8, 2011 at 10:24 | comment | added | JamesRyan | It is a real nuisance that you have done this because although a question may be about a specific vmware product, the answers often apply just as well to the others as a lot of the configuration is the same. Its a bit like someone asking a general sql question about select statements and you tagging it as mssql2000 just because they mentioned that was the product they happened to be using. | |
Mar 28, 2011 at 4:59 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod |
Interesting side-effect of this re-taggging effort: two more badges assigned for vmware-esxi
|
|
Mar 27, 2011 at 22:34 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | @Iain - done. I'm not normally so broad with my tags, I guess I was a lazy tagger haha. Anyway it's Monday morning for me and I've already been at work for 2 hours, so enjoy the rest of your weekend. | |
Mar 27, 2011 at 22:09 | comment | added | user9517 | @MarkHenderson: yeah - Jeff put some effort in so I thought I'd finish it. A weekend is a good time to do it too as it's usually quite quite. Would you mind checking your 2 [vmware] related questions and retag ? Cheers ;) | |
Mar 27, 2011 at 21:12 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | @Iain - so THAT'S why so many VMWare questions were bumping to the front page! | |
Mar 27, 2011 at 20:36 | comment | added | user9517 | status-completed | |
Mar 27, 2011 at 11:21 | comment | added | Chopper3 Mod | Thanks Jeff, as I said I'm much more concerned about people just using the plain 'vmware' tag in the future, oh and I saw your chat post about their product list, personally I find it very easy as that's what I do, it would be much worse if someone just used a plain 'microsoft' tag as they sell hundreds of products. | |
Mar 27, 2011 at 8:34 | vote | accept | user9517 | ||
Jul 9, 2011 at 21:23 | |||||
Mar 27, 2011 at 8:31 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 293 characters in body
|
Mar 27, 2011 at 8:10 | comment | added | user9517 | @JefAtwood: I've noticed - thanks | |
Mar 27, 2011 at 8:10 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 74 characters in body
|
Mar 27, 2011 at 8:09 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @iain yes, I am cleaning all that up now | |
Mar 27, 2011 at 8:04 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 13 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body
|
Mar 27, 2011 at 7:48 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 328 characters in body
|
Mar 27, 2011 at 4:26 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 179 characters in body
|
Mar 27, 2011 at 3:05 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 389 characters in body
|
Mar 27, 2011 at 2:47 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1 characters in body
|
Mar 26, 2011 at 23:46 | comment | added | user9517 | @JohnGardeniers: Some will be like that but many do contain sufficient information to be able to retag them correctly. The real problem with the vmware tag is that it is the first in the list when you start to type vm... so it leads to lazy tagging | |
Mar 26, 2011 at 22:56 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | I suspect a lot of those 700 are too vague to be readily identified for retagging, even of someone wanted to do it manually. | |
Mar 26, 2011 at 22:37 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |