Timeline for Handling illegal/immoral questions and answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jun 24, 2011 at 9:03 | comment | added | dunxd | I'm sure no one is suggesting that answers that could enable someone to break the law should be banned from the site. Would it perhaps be better to rewrite questions that directly seek info on how to do something illegal? | |
| Jun 22, 2011 at 16:51 | answer | added | dunxd | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 21, 2011 at 19:21 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 13, 2011 at 23:37 | answer | added | John Gardeniers | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 13, 2011 at 21:36 | answer | added | sysadmin1138Mod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 13, 2011 at 14:57 | answer | added | EEAA | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 13, 2011 at 10:22 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | fine, so long as it's based on "things that actually happened on Server Fault" and not "everything we might imagine could happen on Server Fault.. eventually.." | |
| Jun 13, 2011 at 9:44 | history | asked | Chopper3Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |