Timeline for Handling very-low-quality answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2011 at 1:29 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | generally this is not what we mean by "very low quality" -- very low quality questions are NOT well worded, they are barely intelligible and would take TONS of invasive editing to fix, to the point that deletion is a more effective solution. | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 19:44 | comment | added | voretaq7 | Re: dangerous answers update, If you have sufficient rep you can see the deleted dangerous answers (nudge nudge, wink wink, join the site and stop being a FREAKIN' LEACH ya damn Googlers!). My fear is always having the dangerous answer pop up in a google search - makes us look bad IMHO | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 19:17 | comment | added | Wesley | @voretaq7 Updated! | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 19:16 | history | edited | Wesley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 819 characters in body
|
| Sep 13, 2011 at 14:20 | comment | added | voretaq7 | I agree that bad answers should be kept, along with their comments though I may draw a distinction between "bad" or "wrong", and "Dangerous and Destructive" ("Q: How do I free up disk space?" -> "A: rm -rf /") - The latter should be expunged and the answering user horsewhipped in the town square. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 23:28 | history | answered | Wesley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |