Timeline for Raising the Tag Limit for Serverfault in Particular
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2011 at 5:22 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:07 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Sep 11, 2009 at 16:12 | answer | added | theotherreceive | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 15:00 | comment | added | Brad Gilbert | I would go through questions that have 5 tags, and post a comment requesting that those users participate on this question. | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 14:32 | comment | added | Kyle Brandt | Sohg9: Ya, you and Pesto have good points. I don't care that much, it is the first time I have run in to it. So no matter how good my argument is I think, unless some other SF people feel they would like more tags, then 5 is fine I guess. So I really just want to see if any of them feel the same way. | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 14:13 | comment | added | Shog9 | @Kyle: i understand... Just trying to help you flesh this out a bit more: as Pesto notes, a single question doesn't justify changing the system, but if you could explain how, say, this question on Server Fault requires a tag for each company, system or technology involved while a question on Stack Overflow need not have a tag for each referenced class, then it might help to strengthen your argument. | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 13:31 | comment | added | Kyle Brandt | Shog: Because they are the technologies used directly with the connection that has the issues. Since I don't know the answer yet, I can't give a better answer then that. | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 13:19 | answer | added | Hilarious Comedy Pesto | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 13:17 | comment | added | Shog9 | @Kyle: they're necessary because...? How do they work to categorize your question such that others with the same problem or potential answers would find it more easily? | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:58 | comment | added | Kyle Brandt | John Smithers: Ya, I think they are... | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:46 | comment | added | Ladybug Killer | Well, you created two new tags with one question. Are they really necessary? | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:32 | answer | added | ベレアー アダム | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:31 | comment | added | Kyle Brandt | My abuse of the tag tags is of course in jest ;-) | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:26 | comment | added | Kyle Brandt | In this one, serverfault.com/questions/64465/slow-performance-with-mpls . I wanted to add 'site-to-site-vpn' and vlan, because those are both important. This is the first time I ran into this myself, So I am interested in what other heavier users of SF think. | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:25 | comment | added | ベレアー アダム | Quick analysis of the public data dump for SF reveals... Oh crap, no data. Uh... I guess... (runs away) | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:23 | comment | added | Shog9 | How 'bout some examples of questions that could use more than 5 tags... | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:21 | comment | added | Ladybug Killer | You can try, but you will fail (even with SF): meta.stackexchange.com/questions/13912/5-tags-is-too-few/13920 | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:19 | answer | added | TheTXI | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 11, 2009 at 12:14 | history | asked | Kyle Brandt | CC BY-SA 2.5 |