Timeline for Bad rejection: Moderators should probably err on the side of inclusion, not on the side of rejection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2011 at 21:01 | comment | added | voretaq7 | I believe you're reading what you want to read, and will not allow yourself to be shown otherwise. Sorry to be blunt, but the community seems to disagree with how you interpret the edit functionality versus the comment functionality. When 10000 people say "A" and one guy says "B" it's very rare that the guy saying B is correct. | |
| Oct 13, 2011 at 20:56 | comment | added | Jerry Asher | I think you're asking for a subtlety here that is beyond the system or most users. Serverfault SPECIFICALLY asked me to "improve the answer" and "add a comment." I chose "improve the answer". Sam and Serverfault said "FU". Now you tell me it's clear that I should have chosen "add a comment." | |
| Oct 13, 2011 at 16:48 | history | answered | voretaq7 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |