Skip to main content

Timeline for Should [leopard] be [os-x-leopard]?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 16, 2011 at 3:24 comment added Andrew @JohnGardeniers see my answer below.
Nov 16, 2011 at 2:08 comment added John Gardeniers @Andrew, does that mean we should also create version number tags for Microsoft products and synonym the release name to the version numbers? Why this call for consistency that is so totally inconsistent?
Nov 16, 2011 at 1:36 comment added Andrew @JohnGardeniers We already synonymed the Ubuntu "codenames" to their version numbers. Besides, the percentage of "professional desktop support" questions around all versions of Mac OS X is tiny compared to any version of Windows.
Nov 15, 2011 at 22:24 comment added John Gardeniers Sorry but we do in fact refer to Microsoft products by name, not version numbers. Not the dev names perhaps but names nonetheless. e.g. Windows 7, Windows XP, Windows NT, Windows Server 2003, etc., etc. How is that different to Tiger, Lion, Leopard, etc.?
Nov 15, 2011 at 20:29 comment added Chopper3 Mod Ubuntu 12 should be 'Twee Shite'
Nov 15, 2011 at 19:28 comment added Mark Henderson Mod I feel teh same about Ubuntu names, only the problem there is that I know we have a few Ubuntu 10.2 servers, but EVERYTHING in their sites refers to Natty or Lucid or some other crazy name and I can never remember which arbitrary name we're running
Nov 15, 2011 at 18:53 comment added MDMarra Oh. Well in that case, have an upvote.
Nov 15, 2011 at 16:58 comment added Chopper3 Mod But they're wrong, it's stupid, we're IT pro's we should talk in riddles and numbers all the time otherwise 'they' will figure out it's all very easy and fire us :)
Nov 15, 2011 at 16:55 comment added MDMarra The problem is that Microsoft doesn't market it as Whistler where Apple strongly pushes the name as the branding over the version number.
Nov 15, 2011 at 16:54 history answered Chopper3Mod CC BY-SA 3.0