Timeline for Inactive mods on SF - Or are they?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

8 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Dec 13, 2011 at 21:53	history	edited	Mark HendersonMod	CC BY-SA 3.0	deleted 5 characters in body
Dec 13, 2011 at 21:53	comment	added	Mark Henderson Mod		I do mean Sam, my mistake.
Dec 13, 2011 at 21:33	comment	added	user9517		`not since sysadmin came on board anyway` Do you mean Sam ? Sysadmin1138 started with you didn't he ?
Dec 13, 2011 at 20:36	comment	added	Chris S		Do keep in mind the community has a range of moderator satisfaction... Your actions alone do not comprise the whole of our experience.
Dec 13, 2011 at 20:34	comment	added	Chris S		We probably don't need more mods. It's more along two lines: 1. Some of the mods active in the UTC-5 Day TZ have made some decisions that have made several people wonder if they're in touch with the community; these mods in particular have been somewhat inactive on the site. 2. We're moving to a state where we have contributor and mods, but not both; and several people think that is something we should avoid (keeping the moderation load low enough that those users can still be active contributors without "neglecting" their duties).
Dec 13, 2011 at 20:34	comment	added	Mark Henderson Mod		Fair enough, I guess I got focussed on the line `Do we have enough mods? I'm not so sure.. Why aren't our current mods answering questions? Not enough time? Or simply no interest?`
Dec 13, 2011 at 19:59	comment	added	MDMarra		I'm not sure that this was necessarily a request for more mods. We can't see mod flags and mod actions, but we can see who is active in the community. We saw that there was at least one mod, maybe more that seemed to be doing a whole lot of nothing. We wanted to know if this is because 1) they were overburdened by taking action on mod things that only they can see 2) they were just plain inactive. If 1, then we need more. If 2, those people should be replaced.
Dec 13, 2011 at 19:38	history	answered	Mark HendersonMod	CC BY-SA 3.0