Timeline for Chat - a plea for moderation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2011 at 19:18 | comment | added | Wesley | @voretaq7 +1 for using the word 'fanny' | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 18:10 | comment | added | voretaq7 | I'm definitely against a two-chats idea. The "official Ned Flanders-ized totally-safe-for-work-here-let-me-wipe-your-fanny-for-you chat will inevitably become a ghost town, and if that's the "official" chat room for the site we'd wind up with newbies going there, looking around at the crickets, and assuming we're all dead... | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:55 | comment | added | Tablemaker | Failing to see a difference whether we personally censor items vs someone doing it for us. The fact still stands that there is no set in stone rules at chat aside from unspoken ones (No flame wars, no personal attacks, no racial/sexual/religious slurs, etc). | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:54 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | @Iain Indeed. The mod-hammer is there to remind you that I shouldn't have to do it for you. | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:33 | comment | added | user9517 | Unexpectedly you have misinterpreted moderation as requiring a moderator. There is personal moderation too | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 14:16 | comment | added | Tablemaker | I do too, honestly. But I'd rather that than modding things to the point where nothing is funny anymore. | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 14:13 | comment | added | MDMarra | I dislike two chats idea. | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 13:46 | history | edited | Tablemaker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A bit o' clarification and formatting.
|
| Dec 15, 2011 at 13:25 | history | answered | Tablemaker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |