Timeline for DFSR and DFS-R tag merge request
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:28 | comment | added | Dan | @MDMarra sent me here and I just scan read it. I lose! | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:26 | comment | added | MDMarra | Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. My brain somehow missed the R in DFSR. In my defense, @Dan missed it too apparently :D | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:26 | comment | added | maweeras | @MDMarra I added dfs-r because it was more relevant. I removed DFS as there was no evidence of a question related to namespaces. And yes I wish people would use DFSN or DFSR specifically. But they dont and when DFS is mentioned, clarification is often required. | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:25 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | @MDMarra We're talking about "DFSR" and "DFS-R". Same thing, one with a hypen, one without. The "DFS" tag is still there with 129 questions on it. | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:25 | comment | added | Dan | I agree with @MDMarra - if someone told me to investigate DFS, I would not assume they were referencing replication and vice versa. Though close, they are distinct. | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:24 | comment | added | MDMarra | Also, the OP edited this to contain the dfs-r tag after this was done. Shouldn't this have made that unnecessary? | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:23 | comment | added | MDMarra | I don't really understand the inner working of synonyms and merging, so perhaps I misunderstand what this means, but that's like merging Windows and Windows-7. DFS is a banner for two related technologies: DFS-R and DFS Namespaces. DFS and DFS-R are not analogous. | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:18 | vote | accept | maweeras | ||
| Dec 16, 2011 at 17:09 | history | answered | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |