Timeline for Making edits and approving edits on a question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 at 13:18 | comment | added | Rob Moir | True enough. Perhaps I chose a bad "example" then, the exception that proves the rule... | |
| Dec 23, 2011 at 13:05 | comment | added | user9517 | In general I would agree that changing code blocks isn't a good thing however each edit has to be taken on it's own merits. So a blanket ban isn't a good thing either. | |
| Dec 23, 2011 at 12:36 | comment | added | Rob Moir | Fair enough Iain - I wanted to talk about the principle of not changing stuff in code blocks, with that question as an example, rather than focus on that one question. I know the guy who proposed the edits knows what they're talking about, I know the edits were probably innocuous and I trust you, but I still feel as a point of principle that there are some things we shouldn't clear up as part of an edit, or allow others to clear up, because these mistakes might be instrumental to the problem being discussed. | |
| Dec 23, 2011 at 11:52 | history | answered | user9517 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |