Timeline for Should we modify the FAQ to include policy subversion as explicitly Off Topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jan 4, 2012 at 22:03 | comment | added | Wesley | @ChrisS's point is excellent. It's all in how a problem is presented. Tell us what you need to find / do rather than why. The more "whys" that are known, the more likely a post is to be picked apart (regardless of who posts it). Remember, SysAdmin tend to be a "how to think" bunch, and not a "what to think" bunch. | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 18:38 | comment | added | Chris S | Upon further review I seems you're getting pretty frustrated with at least a handful of the community members, and they with you. Perhaps it would be a good idea for everyone to take a breather before someone says something they'll regret. =] | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 18:19 | comment | added | Chris S | The fact that you were able to rewrite the question sans policy ambiguities means your question had technical merit in a professional setting. Server Fault is for professional administrators only and there are boundaries to what we should answer based on that professional requirement. It is the community's duty to maintain the community while building a knowledge-base. Suspicious situations will be raised in Questions and for the sake of the professional community it is necessary to question the implications of policy. | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 17:27 | history | edited | dunxd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 342 characters in body
|
| Jan 4, 2012 at 17:20 | history | answered | dunxd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |