Skip to main content

Timeline for How many moderators do we need?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.serverfault.com/ with https://meta.serverfault.com/
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 history edited CommunityBot
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Jan 12, 2012 at 2:15 history edited voretaq7
Add election-2012 tag so we can find this by year later.
Jan 12, 2012 at 1:16 vote accept Shane Madden
Jan 10, 2012 at 23:52 comment added sysadmin1138 Mod Info: In the last 30 days, SF moderators have handled 652 flags. That's 21.7 a day, or .9 an hour. They tend to come in bursts, though.
Jan 10, 2012 at 21:33 comment added voretaq7 @JohnGardeniers Very true - the lifer logic is that you can be truly independent (absent gross misconduct and impeachment), but the flip side is the lifer who only comes to work every other Tuesday for 3 hours (mods who move on & go inactive). // Interestingly in the US we have a mix of both - Lower court judgeships are often regular elected offices with a set term (that typically gets longer as you climb the ladder: My village court is a 3-year term, NY State Supreme Court is 14 years). Perhaps StackOverflow would like to guinea pig that model for us? :-)
Jan 10, 2012 at 21:19 comment added John Gardeniers @voretaq7, that might be the way the federal bench is handled where you are but elsewhere things are done differently. While both systems have their strengths and weaknesses, lifers in anything are rarely as valuable as someone who has to earn a position.
Jan 10, 2012 at 12:57 answer added sysadmin1138Mod timeline score: 5
Jan 10, 2012 at 11:25 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/156698140316143617
Jan 10, 2012 at 8:45 comment added voretaq7 The Stack Overflow opinion is that moderators are moderators for life. … or until they stand down. I would argue that the federal bench is the best analog for moderator positions: Lifetime appointment, we add more judges if we need them (based on case load), and when one retires we fill the vacant seat in addition to any new seats we're adding.
Jan 10, 2012 at 4:58 comment added Chris S "Dealing with sheer flag volume is one aspect of this (which most of us can't speak to), the other is community faith in the moderators. Inactive or semi-inactive moderators may not be equipped to deal with flags appropriately; and even if they are, their lack of visibility to the community leaves a perception that they're disconnected from it." +1 on that alone. Not trying to throw anyone under the bus, but that is exactly the perception.
Jan 10, 2012 at 4:54 answer added Wesley timeline score: 0
Jan 10, 2012 at 4:54 answer added Wesley timeline score: 30
Jan 10, 2012 at 4:54 answer added Wesley timeline score: -14
Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 answer added Ward - Trying CodidactMod timeline score: -3
Jan 10, 2012 at 4:49 history asked Shane Madden CC BY-SA 3.0