Timeline for links in Serverfault not readily visible [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Sep 10, 2013 at 13:02 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 11, 2013 at 13:39 | |||||
| Sep 9, 2013 at 13:01 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 10, 2013 at 7:08 | |||||
| S Aug 7, 2012 at 15:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
insert duplicate link
|
|
| S Aug 7, 2012 at 15:57 | history | closed | Chris SMod | exact duplicate | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 11:44 | answer | added | user11604 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 20:09 | history | edited | user9517Mod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 12, 2011 at 13:45 | comment | added | Nixphoe | I was going to ask the same question but decided to search first (glad I did). I see this question was asked back in 2009. Any update on this? | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:07 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Nov 12, 2009 at 0:38 | comment | added | Jason S | my preference would be dotted underlines, with full underlines on mouse-hover | |
| Nov 11, 2009 at 0:57 | comment | added | squillman | Yeah, agree here as well. I always bold the links to make them more distinguishable. | |
| Nov 10, 2009 at 22:46 | comment | added | random | Dotted underlines of a lighter colour really do look pleasant. | |
| Nov 10, 2009 at 22:03 | history | asked | Jason S | CC BY-SA 2.5 |