Timeline for How does the primary voting algorithm break a tie for 10th place?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jul 23, 2013 at 13:45 | comment | added | Caleb | See also the same question on MSO. | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 22:38 | vote | accept | freiheit | ||
| Jan 23, 2012 at 22:36 | answer | added | Rebecca ChernoffMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 22:13 | comment | added | Zoredache | I wonder if it is something as simple as looking at the vote split. Ward: 22/-12, freiheit 27/-17. You had more down-votes. Everyone who made it to the general seems to have less then or equal to 12 down-votes. Hrm. | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 21:02 | comment | added | freiheit | @MarkHenderson: Yes, but there were several candidates with substantially more + votes | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 18:07 | comment | added | Tablemaker | ITS A CONSPIRACY! | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 0:56 | comment | added | Mark Henderson Mod | Interesting... you actually had far more + votes than ward (but also, far more -'s) | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 0:42 | comment | added | Shane Madden | I'd also be curious to find out what the tiebreaker is. And for what it's worth, you had my vote - a big pile of rep isn't everything, and the moderation experience on another SE site goes a long way. | |
| Jan 21, 2012 at 23:17 | comment | added | freiheit | Honestly, I'm mostly just curious, since I suspect that candidates who come in 10th in the primary are extremely unlikely to win the main election anyways. | |
| Jan 21, 2012 at 23:16 | history | asked | freiheit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |