Timeline for Userbase has gone up, but participation in the election has gone down?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2012 at 4:49 | comment | added | TristanK | Dug up the relevant threads on the process... See MDMarra's answer below :) | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 4:42 | comment | added | TristanK | So there were three stages? Self-nomination (I saw), primaries (?), then actual voting (I did)? Ah well. Maybe it's not that the people weren't liked, maybe it was the commitment requirement! | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 4:02 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | That was in the final phase. In the primaries the voting was the same as it is for questions. Maybe you missed that stage. | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 0:23 | comment | added | TristanK | Could you downvote? That's interesting, it wasn't immediately obvious to me. I thought I clicked people, and their badges came up on the right hand side. Potato, potaaahto. | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 23:52 | comment | added | Bart Silverstrim | You could try factoring in how the candidates did compared to their participation on the chat server for Serverfault and then reference it to voting...although I doubt enough of the people are in chat that it would sway voting much. | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 23:16 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | I doubt this would be a significant factor. As the candidates are all active members of this community the "didn't know" part is less likely and the "like" part is essentially covered by the primary voting, where you could downvote as well as upvote. | |
| Jan 24, 2012 at 21:18 | history | answered | TristanK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |