Timeline for Our FAQ sucks (so let's fix it!)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:32 | vote | accept | voretaq7 | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:31 | vote | accept | voretaq7Mod | ||
| Feb 10, 2012 at 18:31 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2012 at 23:27 | history | edited | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Revise process for what's actually there.
|
| Jan 29, 2012 at 21:10 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Monday morning in what time zone? :) | |
| Jan 27, 2012 at 22:10 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | I heartily agree about the supermajority - particularly as this revision is a pretty big change in our scope (reflecting all the other sites that have sprung up). I think this structured approach is probably the best way to proceed: we've bashed out a skeleton (mostly by the regulars), and this lets us fine-tune it democratically with a wider audience. | |
| Jan 27, 2012 at 12:32 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | @ChrisS The other idea is to skip the edit step and go straight to polling. If enough think it needs more work we can do that. | |
| Jan 27, 2012 at 3:40 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Seems like too much process. I'm sure you can get half a dozen people to jump through all the hoops, but I don't think you'll get much participation with all that. Otherwise I like the general idea. | |
| Jan 27, 2012 at 0:13 | history | answered | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |