Timeline for Is this type of answer acceptable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2012 at 18:31 | vote | accept | Ward - Trying CodidactMod | ||
| Feb 12, 2012 at 13:54 | comment | added | EEAA | Well this is turning into an arms race. He's reverting edits that myself and several others have made to his answers, putting the inappropriate formatting back in place. Example1, Example2, Example3. Perhaps an email from a mod is in order? | |
| Feb 12, 2012 at 1:06 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | I would be more inclined to beat him with a rubber hose if the "further reading" links to his articles weren't (mostly) relevant, or if he had ads on them (I didn't spot any). I'm a bit annoyed he's not stating that they're his articles more explicitly though, and the bold headlines in every answer bug me -- It makes the times the rest of us do it (like telling people to for the love of $_DEITY turn off telnet) have less impact... | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 22:58 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Ok, maybe I'm wrong and he really is spamming. Of course rolling back my edits means I'm more likely to be hard on him. | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 18:55 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | OTOH, at the end of an answer about PTR records, he's got link to one of his posts that's almost unrelated to the rest of the answer. | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 17:14 | comment | added | Ward - Trying Codidact Mod | He doesn't always link to his own articles, sometimes it's to technet articles or other sources. But somehow the combination of the bold heading and the links to his (mostly) his own articles seems like a way to drive traffic to his blog. | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 15:15 | history | answered | Chris SMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |