Skip to main content

Timeline for Is this type of answer acceptable?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 12, 2012 at 20:02 comment added EEAA The blog post you cite could be used to support either of our viewpoints. In this instance, I'm frankly sick of thinking about it so I'll let it go. I still maintain, though, that sentences-long section headings are problematic on many levels. If this person wants to continue using them, so be it. The community will do their thing and munge answers into the format they prefer.
Feb 12, 2012 at 17:43 history edited the-wabbit CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Feb 12, 2012 at 17:07 history edited the-wabbit CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1149 characters in body
Feb 12, 2012 at 16:05 comment added EEAA I clearly do not have any gripe about his content. There is nothing personal going on here. The edit button is there for a reason- myself and several others feel the formatting could use some help. So we helped.
Feb 12, 2012 at 15:48 comment added the-wabbit This meta QA is anything but a representative sample. It also typically will represent the attitude of the regular answer posters, not the one of questioners or information seekers who are likely to have different views on things. As long as he is posting profound answers, he definitely should be left alone. Personal resentments or controversies around taste or style surely do not diminish the value of his contribution.
Feb 12, 2012 at 14:38 comment added EEAA If we were used to seeing sentences-long section headers around here, perhaps it would be less of an issue. But no one else here does that and as such, it's very jarring at first sight and then continues to be distracting while reading the post. If the community prefers to see answers written in a certain way, that's what the edit button is for. I may be wrong, but from this meta QA, there are more than a few of us that think his markup is distracting.
Feb 12, 2012 at 14:27 history answered the-wabbit CC BY-SA 3.0