Timeline for Observation: Up-Voting appears to be more much rare here than on SU
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2012 at 15:10 | comment | added | Rob Moir | Indeed, @gwaldo. We should encourage people to consider voting on questions (whether up or down) as needed. But I totally agree we shouldn't be voting just for the sake of voting or to "make SF warmer and fuzzier". | |
| Mar 8, 2012 at 15:08 | comment | added | gWaldo | I go through phases where I try to vote more, especially on questions. But honestly, there are many where I just don't think it's good enough to warrant the upvote, especially if I have some knowledge of the problem-space. It may not be bad enough to warrant a down-vote, but I don't praise mediocrity. I try to provide follow-up questions or edit if I think it can help. I do upvote on questions that I can't help with but the question was well-constructed with what appears to be quality supporting information. In those cases, I usually make such a comment. | |
| Mar 7, 2012 at 20:49 | history | answered | Rob Moir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |