Timeline for Edits to fix code formatting and remove harmful info rejected as "too minor"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| May 8, 2012 at 14:28 | comment | added | Nick Chammas | I'm certainly against flooding the front page with old material. However, I understand that the majority of people reading questions come through Google long after they've been answered. Therefore, a good edit should be made, regardless of the post's age, since lots of people will benefit from it. If the bump that big of a problem, perhaps one of the default reasons to reject an edit should be "post is too old". Otherwise, yes, that "minor edit" proposal would squarely address this issue. | |
| May 8, 2012 at 14:08 | vote | accept | Nick Chammas | ||
| May 7, 2012 at 18:25 | history | edited | Chris SMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Darn spelling autocorrect...
|
| May 7, 2012 at 17:26 | history | answered | Chris SMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |