Timeline for Shopping Question? Why?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Jul 30, 2012 at 23:36 | comment | added | gWaldo | No worries, @JohnGardeniers. I try to be helpful in my trolling... I'm quite fed up with some of the hand-holding that many people seem to require. It makes me want to point to the "Professional" part of the site charter more often than not. | |
| Jul 30, 2012 at 23:22 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | @gWaldo, thanks for the edit. As you could probably tell, I wasn't feeling like spoon feeding when I posted the answer. | |
| Jul 30, 2012 at 23:18 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | @TechZilla, perhaps you are unaware that we have recently updated the FAQ. Although nobody would consider it perfect the amount of effort and discussion that went into it means none of us are in a hurry to do it again any time soon. It's all here on Meta if you're interested. For the record, I don't fully agree with the harshness of our attitude to shopping questions but that attitude stems from the owners of Stack Exchange more than anyone else. Whether I agree with it or not, that's what we have and I voted accordingly. | |
| Jul 30, 2012 at 15:58 | history | edited | gWaldo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
adding a link. Y'know, to be helpful...
|
| Jul 30, 2012 at 14:40 | comment | added | J. M. Becker | I also had an open source project question considered 'shopping'... If this scouring is considered 'shopping', then buying products from NewEgg is a dream come true. More importantly, regardless of merit, the FAQ/Q&A should be updated . After reading it, with comments, it did not close the door in such a manner you would ideally desire. | |
| Jul 30, 2012 at 6:21 | history | answered | John Gardeniers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |