Timeline for Can we merge tags for wireless networks
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 7, 2012 at 22:06 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | @smcg, why? I'm able to search for such things just fine. | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 20:43 | comment | added | smcg | 802.11 is probably terrible for search engine purposes. | |
Dec 4, 2012 at 2:55 | comment | added | Andrew | WiMax, cellular mobile and point-to-point microwave is "wireless networking" too, but I don't think there's an "RF Engineering" SE, yet? | |
Nov 30, 2012 at 23:38 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Potentially yes, although I've yet to see a Bluetooth question that is on topic. Regardless, if we're trying to make a single tag to cover what we normally consider to be "wireless" then it should ideally be as exclusionist as possible. | |
Nov 30, 2012 at 10:25 | comment | added | Tom O'Connor | I'm now pondering whether Bluetooth is actually On Topic for SF! | |
Nov 30, 2012 at 5:39 | comment | added | John Gardeniers |
wireless-network is still a little vague for my tastes. e.g. Bluetooth is wireless networking, even though it normally consists of only two devices on that network.
|
|
Nov 30, 2012 at 0:31 | comment | added | Tom O'Connor | I think i generally prefer wireless-network but 802.11 isn't bad either. | |
Nov 30, 2012 at 0:14 | history | answered | John Gardeniers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |