Timeline for Should we delete closed questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2012 at 10:42 | answer | added | user9517Mod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 28, 2012 at 8:27 | comment | added | user9517 Mod | @WesleyDavid: The reverse happens - people use them as support for posting their own questions many new people (and some longer term contributors) don't understand what closed means. | |
| Dec 28, 2012 at 1:41 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | Good theory but there's no evidence to suggest that it's working | |
| Dec 27, 2012 at 23:02 | answer | added | HopelessN00b | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 27, 2012 at 23:00 | comment | added | Wesley | I believe that any closed question that is not automagically deleted by the StackExchange system needs to remain in its ignoble state as a documented warning for future contributors. Something like staking the heads of our victims outside the castle gates. Abandon all hope... | |
| Dec 27, 2012 at 22:53 | answer | added | Chris SMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 27, 2012 at 22:24 | history | asked | John Gardeniers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |