Timeline for Should I edit my old unanswered question or start a new one?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2015 at 13:34 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | @kasperd I think it only gets one shot. | |
| Oct 20, 2015 at 8:50 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | Best to do it once, and do it right ;). People would get annoyed at constant unnecessary bumping. Edits should be substantial rather than minor. If you're really lucky, you might find your own answers. | |
| Oct 20, 2015 at 8:20 | comment | added | kasperd | @MichaelHampton Only once? Or repeatedly, if the first edit was insufficient to get it reopened? | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 23:33 | comment | added | Michael Hampton | Editing a closed question also automatically puts it into the reopen review queue. | |
| Jan 25, 2013 at 2:06 | comment | added | John Gardeniers | And having a question closed as a duplicate of one that is also closed is really annoying. :) | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 15:28 | comment | added | Rob Moir | Always this. Writing a new question that duplicates an old one you've written is likely to see your new question closed as a duplicate of the old one on pretty much all the Stack Exchange sites. | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 15:23 | vote | accept | nn4l | ||
| Jan 23, 2013 at 15:22 | history | answered | Journeyman Geek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |