Timeline for When did UDP hole punching become off-topic on Server Fault?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 8, 2013 at 22:47 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @canpoyrazoğlu You really don't need to convince me; I could only tolerate one quarter of living in dorms when I was in school. But even if we accept that you're completely right, you're still trying to circumvent policy (which is misuse of the network), still in a home setting, and still not functioning in a professional capacity, so the question's off topic. | |
Feb 8, 2013 at 22:23 | comment | added | Can Poyrazoğlu | well it "could" be seen as a misuse if not analyzed correctly. but the whole intention is to be able to connect to my own PC which is behind a NAT. i'm not into any malicious act. i would do it at my home network, and I'm actually living there, and I need a way to access my PC. in addition, lots of legitimate programs and games already utilize this, so from that perspective, using any of these programs would also be considered misuse. i don't remember signing any contract regarding these aspects of "misuse". i don't think anyone should sue someone without malicious intent for udp punching. | |
Feb 8, 2013 at 21:48 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @canpoyrazoğlu Because you're asking for help circumventing security or policy (your university's NAT scheme), and your UDP hole idea could be seen as hacking and/or system misuse. If one of my users tried something like that on my network, they'd have my boot so far up their ass they'd be able to feel it in the back of their throat. | |
Feb 8, 2013 at 21:32 | comment | added | Can Poyrazoğlu | ok, I thought it was appropriate to ask network-related issues here without being an IT manager, that's my mistake, but I have no idea why you've highlighted the second part. | |
Feb 8, 2013 at 16:27 | history | answered | HopelessN00b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |