Timeline for review test: low quality
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2013 at 22:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/ServerFault/status/313051593064988672 | ||
Mar 16, 2013 at 17:14 | comment | added | Sven | I failed the same thing and others which are equally gray area stuff where I disagreed with this audit systems view of things. For what it's worth, this crap has reduced my motivation to review to zero. | |
Mar 16, 2013 at 3:04 | vote | accept | Hauke Laging | ||
Mar 15, 2013 at 19:59 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @Zoredache While it's not exactly a high quality answer, that's not necessarily the same as an answer deserving a delete vote, a downvote and/or a flag. Like Chris points out in his answer, the review audit system is supposed to providing tests with example that are clear-cut right or wrong, and it's not, due to the current implementation used to select audit material. Yippie, devops. | |
Mar 15, 2013 at 19:57 | comment | added | mgorven | I almost failed this exact test... ;-) | |
Mar 15, 2013 at 19:46 | answer | added | user9517Mod | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 15, 2013 at 18:59 | answer | added | Chris SMod | timeline score: 13 | |
Mar 15, 2013 at 18:47 | comment | added | Zoredache |
It certainly isn't a high quality answer. I usually would have used a comment to say something like yes that is the way . Then I probably would have looked very close to see if the question needed to be closed. A question that only had that as a valid answer usually isn't very well written.
|
|
Mar 15, 2013 at 18:44 | comment | added | MDMarra | That was an actual answer, If you had 10k rep you could see that it was deleted by a mod which is probably what put it into the test queue. Honestly, this whole test queue thing sucks. | |
Mar 15, 2013 at 18:27 | comment | added | jscott | I think this is a valid Meta question, but probably belongs on meta.stackoverflow.com -- they handle the "how SE works" questions. The "Yes, that's the correct way." answer was a real answer at one point, but it has since been deleted. | |
Mar 15, 2013 at 18:16 | history | asked | Hauke Laging | CC BY-SA 3.0 |