Timeline for review test: low quality
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2013 at 13:52 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | The system is still in "Beta", it's only on the trilogy sites, and only certain audit failures lead to review-bans right now. The Devs are looking at the failure rates, what's causing high failures, etc. They've been taking their time with it, so I wouldn't expect dramatic improvements soon; but they'll get there. | |
| Mar 19, 2013 at 11:33 | comment | added | dunxd | I just got one too which looked like it got closed because it was answered by someone promoting a tool they wrote. However, it had a comment that pointed this conflict of interest out already, and was otherwise a valid answer so I clicked Leave Open. So this is a beta test right? Or just wasting peoples time? | |
| Mar 16, 2013 at 3:04 | vote | accept | Hauke Laging | ||
| Mar 15, 2013 at 19:07 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Rewrote most of my post. See edit. | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 19:05 | history | edited | Chris SMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 491 characters in body
|
| Mar 15, 2013 at 19:03 | comment | added | Hauke Laging | What do you mean by "graded"? Selecting as "this answer should be used for review tests"? | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 18:59 | history | answered | Chris SMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |