Timeline for Migrations: Unix vs. Superuser?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2013 at 13:03 | vote | accept | Andrew B | ||
| Mar 18, 2013 at 3:04 | comment | added | Chris S Mod | Unix.SE fits completely within SU in my opinion; with the exception of professional environment questions, which overlap with SF. But otherwise Unix has no unique angle to it. With that basis, anything that is well-written, OT for SF, and completely *nix topically gets migrated to Unix.SE. If it's well-written, OT, and not completely *nix then SU. But that's my simplistic view. | |
| Mar 17, 2013 at 19:27 | comment | added | Andrew B | @lain The trailing whitespace is causing that to return a 404. Thanks for nudging in me in that direction though. | |
| Mar 17, 2013 at 18:47 | comment | added | user9517 Mod | @AndrewB:This is interesting blog.stackoverflow.com/2012/03/… | |
| Mar 17, 2013 at 17:46 | comment | added | Andrew B | That's pretty much the vibe I'm getting: anything that could go to Unix.SE could potentially go to SU as well, barring some very narrow cases. (*nix on unusual hardware platforms, like gaming consoles, can only to Unix.SE) In practice, I'm finding that it's statistically narrow that anything flagged for Unix.SE ever gets sent there. This is probably fine as-is, I just opted for a sanity check. | |
| Mar 17, 2013 at 17:42 | history | answered | user9517Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |