Timeline for Why the hostility?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Apr 12, 2013 at 19:18 | history | edited | Kenny Evitt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I fixed a misspelling.
|
| Apr 3, 2013 at 21:14 | comment | added | Kenny Evitt | I disagree. SO and SF at least are filled with low-value questions. And 'broad' questions aren't necessarily discussions. But regardless of where we could agree to draw the line on when a question becomes a discussion, there are excellent questions with excellent answers that are widely considered to be too broad according to the site FAQs. And yet the sites themselves seem perfectly capable of letting users accumulate and organize that info. The hostility on these sites tho is definitely one of the main aspects driving away users new and old alike. | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 17:44 | comment | added | Andrew B | I agree RE: civility, disagree RE: broadness. The focused nature of SE is what drives up the value of the answers. Avoidance of broad discussions don't have a definitive "answer" is one of the characteristics significantly distinguishing these sites from forums and it should probably remain that way. | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 13:54 | history | answered | Kenny Evitt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |