Timeline for Why is the close vote quota so low?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2013 at 16:08 | comment | added | Jonesome Reinstate Monica | @sysadmin1138 another thought: If the % is considered high, perhaps reducing the close quota would force more eyeballs on the process and slow the close process down. There is nothing wrong with slowing it down, allowing the OP to improve the post, that kind of thing. | |
| Oct 16, 2013 at 16:07 | comment | added | Jonesome Reinstate Monica | @sysadmin1138 Agreed. Sounds high to me also. I am concerned that a chunk of the questions closed are quality questions that are being closed for subjective reasons. To me a quality question is something that is topical for many admins. Example: I recently noticed a lot of posts related to comparing cloud servers are closed because they are "comparison shopping" or such. But such topics are central to the work of many admins today. Disallowing them forces those conversations off the site. | |
| Oct 16, 2013 at 15:51 | comment | added | sysadmin1138 Mod | @samsmith Very high, it means that a large percentage of incoming questions do not fit for one reason or another. | |
| Oct 16, 2013 at 15:37 | comment | added | Jonesome Reinstate Monica | Is a close rate of %28 considered good/bad, high or low? | |
| Jun 29, 2013 at 5:53 | vote | accept | Falcon Momot | ||
| Jun 28, 2013 at 14:52 | comment | added | Michael Hampton Mod | What we're (moderators) supposed to do obviously needs to be something completely different, at least in the short term. | |
| Jun 28, 2013 at 11:17 | history | answered | sysadmin1138Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |